https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779 --- Comment #31 from Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #29) > (In reply to comment #27) > > - you should try to document, which files are licensed in which way > > Please explain what need to be documented ? > Ideally, you'd list the files belonging to which license. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios: In addition, the package must contain a comment explaining the multiple licensing breakdown. The actual implementation of this is left to the maintainer > I think I need to change > From MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ > To MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ yes. > > All files have the 3 licences (exactly like thunderbird/firefox/...) > > /* ***** BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK ***** > * Version: MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1 > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review