https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381 --- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- Issues: ======= [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: Missing: 'Requires: %%{name} =' in: %package doc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. Note: Cannot find licenses in rpm(s) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames [!]: Dist tag is present. [!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. Note: Source0 (jogl-v2.0-rc10.tar.7z) [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define. Note: %define pkg_release 0.%{baserelease}.%{pkg_rc}%{?dist} %define pkg_release %{baserelease}%{?dist} should be simply %global pkg_release 0.%{baserelease}.%{pkg_rc}%{?dist} please, can you check,also, if in gluegen2 package is present gluegen.cpptasks.detect.os -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review