Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-13 19:24 EST ------- I would even prefer a yet more radical splitting: * a -lib package with content of /usr/lib/aspell-0.60, the libs and the .mo files * move the precat, preunzip, prezip, prezip-bin and word-list-compress binaries either into -devel (afais, they are only used to create dictionaries), or into a new -utils subpackage * move 'aspell-import' into -utils * keep aspell, ispell, run-with-aspell, spell and related man pages in main package. 'aspell' adds a ncurses dep which is not needed by -libs * at first glance, 'aspell.info' contains end user information only and should stay in main and does not need to be moved into -lib ======= Other issues: * remove the explicit 'Requires: aspell-en'; I am pretty sure that my mom will never have use for the english dictionary but uses the german one only * are all the 'Conflicts:' really required for a recent system? * the | Provides: pspell < 0.13 | Obsoletes: pspell < 0.13 does not seem to make sense; either write 'Provides: pspell = 0.13', or remove it completely. Ditto for -devel * the | Requires(pre): /sbin/install-info is wrong and should be 'Requires(post)' * /sbin/ldconfig MUST be required * afair, there was a rule, that Summary: must not begin with 'A'. * the 'exit 0' in the scriptlets does not make sense -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review