https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362 --- Comment #21 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #20) > Hi, > > (In reply to comment #17) > > With 0.5.3 sources, with dropped patches, rebuilt FlightCrew and ZipArchive, > > rebuilt Sigil works just fine on Fedora 16 (local mock build). > > > > Has this review stopped due to embedded libtidy? > > That, and a serious case of -ENOTIME, if an interested Fedora packager want > to take this over, please feel free to do so, > > > What needs to be done to finish this up...? > > A good question, Dan, what is your intent of comment #15, do you want sigil > to move to the system libtidy? And if so, just use the system libtidy as is > (could be troublesome), or try to get the sigil patches added (probably also > trouble some since they seem somewhat ebook specific)... ideally the local changes to libtidy would be integrated to upstream libtidy or to the Fedora package, libtidy seems as not-so-alive project, so even having the local copy in sigil is fine with me One good thing about sigil upstream is that it now has checks for all the bundled libraries in the cmake control file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review