Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228544 dan@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dan@xxxxxxxx 2007-02-13 16:47 EST ------- And finally I have updated my rawhide mirror and here is the result from a mock rebuild: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I/lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include -I../include -I../../lib -Wall -Wunused -Wstrict-prototypes -D_KRNL_2_6_ -D_WITHOUT_LINKWATCH_ -D_WITH_LVS_ -D_HAVE_IPVS_SYNCD_ -c vrrp_netlink.c gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I/lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include -I../include -I../../lib -Wall -Wunused -Wstrict-prototypes -D_KRNL_2_6_ -D_WITHOUT_LINKWATCH_ -D_WITH_LVS_ -D_HAVE_IPVS_SYNCD_ -c vrrp_arp.c In file included from /usr/include/net/ethernet.h:26, from ../include/vrrp_arp.h:29, from vrrp_arp.c:29: /usr/include/sys/types.h:62: error: conflicting types for 'dev_t' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:22: error: previous declaration of 'dev_t' was here /usr/include/sys/types.h:67: error: conflicting types for 'gid_t' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:54: error: previous declaration of 'gid_t' was here /usr/include/sys/types.h:72: error: conflicting types for 'mode_t' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:24: error: previous declaration of 'mode_t' was here /usr/include/sys/types.h:77: error: conflicting types for 'nlink_t' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:25: error: previous declaration of 'nlink_t' was here /usr/include/sys/types.h:82: error: conflicting types for 'uid_t' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:53: error: previous declaration of 'uid_t' was here In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:133, from /usr/include/net/ethernet.h:26, from ../include/vrrp_arp.h:29, from vrrp_arp.c:29: /usr/include/time.h:105: error: conflicting types for 'timer_t' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:31: error: previous declaration of 'timer_t' was here In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:220, from /usr/include/net/ethernet.h:26, from ../include/vrrp_arp.h:29, from vrrp_arp.c:29: /usr/include/sys/select.h:78: error: conflicting types for 'fd_set' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:21: error: previous declaration of 'fd_set' was here In file included from /usr/include/net/ethernet.h:26, from ../include/vrrp_arp.h:29, from vrrp_arp.c:29: /usr/include/sys/types.h:235: error: conflicting types for 'blkcnt_t' /lib/modules/2.6.20-1.2922.fc7/build/include/linux/types.h:152: error: previous declaration of 'blkcnt_t' was here vrrp_netlink.c: In function 'netlink_socket': vrrp_netlink.c:89: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'getsockname' differ in signedness vrrp_arp.c: In function 'send_gratuitous_arp': vrrp_arp.c:84: warning: pointer targets in initialization differ in signedness make[2]: *** [vrrp_arp.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/keepalived-1.1.13/keepalived/vrrp' make[1]: *** [all] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/keepalived-1.1.13/keepalived' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83976 (%build) This needs to be fixed too. So the approval is on hold. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review