https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520 --- Comment #19 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Well, I agree that the application vs library might be a bit fuzzy. But if > > you take a look on Puppet, non of its files are installed into Ruby's > > %{ruby_vendorlibdir}, while all of hiera's files are installed there. In > > this case, it seems that hiera is more library then application and > > therefore it should have ruby- prefix. > > I don't make the same observation? I see puppet and hiera as from a > packaging point of view identical. Actually, I was wrong. I was looking into -sever subpackage instead :/ But anyway, if I did the review for puppet, I would suggest them to split the package into puppet and ruby-puppet as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review