[Bug 847811] Review Request: libee - An event expression library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811

Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)     |
              Flags|fedora-review?              |
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
I think the license tag is wrong - it should be probably either LGPLv2+ and MIT
or LGPLv2+ alone. The statement at the beginning of COPYING file is probably an
upstream mistake as the full text of the license is LGPL2.1 and not GPL.

Please correct the licence tag and notify upstream about the mistake.

I will approve the package anyway as the licence tag mistake can be fixed
before import.

rpmlint -v libee-0.4.1-3.fc16.src.rpm libee-0.4.1-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm
libee-devel-0.4.1-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm libee-utils-0.4.1-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm
libee.src: I: checking
libee.src: I: checking-url http://www.libee.org (timeout 10 seconds)
libee.src: I: checking-url
http://www.libee.org/files/download/libee-0.4.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
libee.x86_64: I: checking
libee.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.libee.org (timeout 10 seconds)
libee-devel.x86_64: I: checking
libee-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rsyslog -> serology
libee-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.libee.org (timeout 10 seconds)
libee-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libee-utils.x86_64: I: checking
libee-utils.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.libee.org (timeout 10 seconds)
libee-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libee-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libee-convert
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

The spelling error is not a real error.

Missing documentation and manual page is upstream issue.

Tarball matches the upstream sources.

The package complies with Fedora packaging and licensing guidelines.

The package is ACCEPTED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]