https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857705 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint spelling warnings only; they're noise and can be ignored. dataquay.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US datastore -> data store, data-store, devastator dataquay.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US datastores -> data stores, data-stores, devastator dataquay.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US schemas -> schema, sachems, schemes dataquay.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal dataquay.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hoc -> ho, choc, hock dataquay.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment I agree with your comment that the actual license text is more like MIT than BSD. All of the MUST items are met. Package builds in mock, with selinux off -- see bug #857709. If we're going to put this in before that's fixed, maybe a comment in the spec file should reference the bug? The package description notes that the datastore is changeable at compile time. I think it should note that the Fedora package is built with Redland (and maybe that the docs recommend that for general-purpose packaging?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review