https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249 --- Comment #9 from Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #7) If you were aware of the dupe for source sans it would have been nice to say so here. Also, your URLs give "object not found". (In reply to comment #8) > I built the same rpm, probably for much the same reason as Tobias. I Just > took the SPEC file from the existing adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts rpm and > edited the pertinent lines and rebuilt against the package downloaded from > Sourceforge > > SPEC: > https://github.com/mattrose/Source-Code-Pro/blob/master/rpm/SPECS/adobe- > source-code-pro-fonts.spec > SRPM: > https://github.com/mattrose/Source-Code-Pro/blob/master/rpm/SRPMS/adobe- > source-code-pro-fonts-1.009-1.fc17.src.rpm > RPM: > https://github.com/mattrose/Source-Code-Pro/blob/master/rpm/RPMS/noarch/ > adobe-source-code-pro-fonts-1.009-1.fc17.noarch.rpm > > All my terminals have it and it has saved me a bunch of eye-strain already. > It really is a very nice font. rpmlint gives 2 errors on that rpm. The lines in the spec are too long, and the source URL does not resolve. Is this really a straight adaption of the source sans spec? Have you filed a packaging request, Matt? We don't want another dupe. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review