[Bug 859068] Review Request: log4cplus - Logging Framework for C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859068

--- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> As for:
> [ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
>      "Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v2 or later)".
> 
> There is only one file with license GPL (v2 or later): ltmain.sh
> The rest is licensed under Apache (v2.0). Maybe you could note this in the
> SPEC file.

Inclusion of GPLv2 license shouldn't be needed because ltmain.sh is
autogenerated by libtool and is not part of sources.

Other issues should be fixed in this version:

spec: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/log4cplus.spec
srpm: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/log4cplus-1.1.0-0.2.rc10.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]