https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857524 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |a.badger@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |a.badger@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> --- ba80c4b0b97f1b53a306e6954d072f67e652f03d2924353a62e609e2c3d7928a django-federated-login-0.3.0.tar.gz APPROVED Good: * Source matches upstream * Package name follows naming guidelines * License is MIT in spec and code * license file included * Spec file is legible * No locale files * Not a C library * No bundled libraries * Not relocatable * Macros used consistently * Code not content * No GUI application * All filenames are UTF-8 * No scriptlets used * builds in koji * Owns directories it creates and nothing more * Permissions on files set properly * rpmlint python-django-federated-login.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) logins -> losing, loins, lo gins python-django-federated-login.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee python-django-federated-login.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. These all make sense in the context of the package. Ignorable. Note: * Package currently has no test suite so currently the %check section is a no-op No harm in having it though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review