https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839098 --- Comment #5 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Many thanks for the comment, and sorry that I asked for someone to review the package in "scitech at lists.fedoraproject.org" but now all is good as you took the bug for yourself :-) I created the ticket https://github.com/sublee/flask-silk/issues/1 asking for inclusion of LICENSE (and test.py) in the tarball. The files were 2 years old, so I also added them to the current package. Please rum fedora-review using rawhide for the mock build as I am submitting it for rawhide, or, assuming it will be approved, should I ask for a f17 and f18 branch? Asking because it is build requires of python-flask-autoindex, that is next :-) Update: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/python-flask-silk.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/python-flask-silk-0.1.1-5.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review