[Bug 855529] Review Request: pygrib - Python module for reading and writing GRIB (editions 1 and 2) files (2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855529

--- Comment #2 from jdekloe <kloe0040@xxxxxxxxx> ---
new versions of the SRPM and SPEC file are here:

Spec URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pygrib.spec
SRPM URL: http://jdekloe.nl/Fedora/pygrib-1.9.4-3.fc17.src.rpm

Volker:

>Building with openjpeg works, locally on F16 as well as on F17

yes this is correct. It is pyproj that is the problem. This is not required for
building, but it is for running the module!

>I thought about spelling it "pre-cooked"!

A I see, so 'k' not 'ck'. I could not find it in my regular dictionary, but
according to some online dictionaries it should be without dash as well, so I
changed it into precooked ...

>To my knowledge, BRing grib_api-static and g2clib-static should be enough. No >need to have grib_api-devel and g2clib-devel too.

Thanks for explaining. This actually was not obvious at all to me. Building the
c-code needs the header files which are part of the devel packages. Apparantly
this happens automatically if the static packages are BR'ed? I must have
overlooked the documentation section that explains this.
Anyway, I removed them and the package still builds alright.

>That comment doesn't make sense:

I tried to rephrase it.

> Devel packages always require the base package. You therefore mostly need to > specify devel packages as BR.

Doesn't this contradict your suggestion above to remove the grib_api-devel and
g2clib-devel?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]