Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-13 00:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ============================== > RPMLINT OUTPUT FOR SOURCE RPM: > ============================== > > W: dom2-core-tests non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML Ignoring since groups can apparently be arbitrary > W: dom2-core-tests invalid-license W3C Software License http://www.opensource.org/licenses/W3C.php suggests license is OSI approved Using W3C License in this field > W: dom2-core-tests rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Removed > W: dom2-core-tests mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 42) Fixed > W: dom2-core-tests class-path-in-manifest /dom2-core-tests-20040405.jar Ignoring since these are mandated by package build process > =============================== > RPMLINT OUTPUT FOR BINARY RPMS: > =============================== > > dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp.noarch.rpm: > ------------------------------------------------- > W: dom2-core-tests non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML Ignoring since groups can apparently be arbitrary > W: dom2-core-tests invalid license W3C Software license See above > W: dom2-core-tests no-documentation There doesnt seem to be anything in the build directory to use for doc, can we waive this? > dom2-core-tests-javadoc-00,01-0.20040405-1jpp.noarch.rpm: > --------------------------------------------------------- > W: dom2-core-tests-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation Ignore as above > W: dom2-core-tests-javadoc invalid-license W3C Software License Changed to W3C License > W: dom2-core-tests-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%post rm > w: dom2-core-tests-javadoc dangerous-command-in-%postun rm Removed the use of post and postun scripts > - Fix %Release tag. Fixed > > - Remove %Vendor and &Distribution. > > - Add "-%(%{__id_u} -n)" to the end of %BuildRoot. > > - In the future, when adding gcj support, remove %BuildArch. > Fixed > - Change the changelog entry format. Ralph's email should read > "<r.apel@xxxxxxxxx>". > I think the guidelines are more particular about the location of ENVR in the changelog The SRPM is at: http://tequila-sunrise.ath.cx/rpmreviews/F7/dom2-core-tests/dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.1.20040405.1jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review