https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844589 --- Comment #3 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- Issues: * Tests require perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Exception) as patched in to remove perl(Test::Exception::LessClever). * There are 3 duplicates in Requires, I think you can remove the unversioned ones; perl(B::Compiling), perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope), perl(Devel::Declare): $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Devel-Declare-Parser-0.017-1.fc17.noarch.rpm | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) 1 perl(B::Compiling) 1 perl(B::Compiling) >= 0.02 1 perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) 1 perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) >= 0.08 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Data::Dumper) 1 perl(Devel::BeginLift) 1 perl(Devel::Declare) 1 perl(Devel::Declare) >= 0.006 1 perl(Devel::Declare::Interface) 1 perl(Devel::Declare::Parser) 1 perl(Devel::Declare::Parser::Sublike) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(base) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 * rpmlint issues can be ignored: perl-Devel-Declare-Parser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers perl-Devel-Declare-Parser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US usualy -> usual, usually, usual y perl-Devel-Declare-Parser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subclassing -> sub classing, sub-classing, subclass perl-Devel-Declare-Parser.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers perl-Devel-Declare-Parser.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US usualy -> usual, usually, usual y perl-Devel-Declare-Parser.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subclassing -> sub classing, sub-classing, subclass 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. * license issues as well, included README says "Standard perl license" in COPYRIGHT section which is "GPL+ or Artistic". [!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames [!]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review