https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850789 --- Comment #20 from Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #19) > <headdesk> > > Adding quagga maintainer. > > Adam, would you be averse to splitting out quagga's babeld into > quagga-babeld so I can Conflict with just that, in case people want to use > quagga and babeld but not quagga's babeld? Or should I just conflict with > quagga? In my opinion it doesn't make much sence to use two different routing daemons on one machine, does it? I would prefer to just conflict with quagga. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review