https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852892 Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for the review. > [!]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached > diff). > > I suppose the specfile outside the SRPM is more recent. Please, confirm. > Correct, I just forget to refresh the SRPM :), fixed without version bump. > [!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > > spec file states GPL+, included COPYING file is GPLv2 > I guess it is OK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F But I will ask upstream to clarify their intention. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review