https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852329 --- Comment #6 from Dan Yasny <dyasny@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #5) > ok, this is now correct from a packaging guidelines perspective, but now we > have the other issue: vdsm is not in base or optional RHEL channel so EPEL > cannot depend on it (repoclosure must be possible with base RHEL > subscription) every package in EPEL should have one in RHEL channels? But the whole idea is to have packages that are not shipped in RHEL channels, isn't it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review