https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852898 --- Comment #1 from Gerd v. Egidy <gerd@xxxxxxxx> --- Some additional info for review: rpmlint output: # rpmlint /home/gerd/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/CImg-devel-1.5.0-4.fc17.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint /home/gerd/rpmbuild/SRPMS/CImg-1.5.0-4.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint CImg.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I also did koji scratch builds for f16 to f18 which succeeded: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4436135 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4436149 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4436182 The only thing I'm not 100% sure is the naming of the package: this is a C++ template library which consists only of a header file and documentation. There is no .so or .a created or needed. I was shown the package "eigen2" which is exactly the same kind. I modeled my package exactly like that: - the .spec is called CImg.spec - it contains a %package devel - all files are in %files devel - there is no %files, so there is no CImg-%{version}...rpm created, just the -devel one -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review