[Bug 851279] Review Request: eucalyptus - Elastic Utility Computing Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851279

--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> ---
Review would be surely easier if the source was splitted into smaller
component, but I guess that this would require a rather huge change upstream :)

I am also quite surprised by the number of BuildRequires, are we sure they are
all needed ?

For the license of eucalyptus-axis2-clients, that's GPLv3, not BSD in the spec
? And if upstream do not ship license, you should ask them to include it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]