Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-12 09:29 EST ------- Well, (In reply to comment #10) > SRPM URL: > ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm * Documentation - Please add more documents ------------------------------------------- AUTHORS NEWS ------------------------------------------- - "INSTALL" is not needed because this is needed when trying to install by themselves. * URL Which URL is preferable, http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse-convmvfs/ or http://fuse-convmvfs.sourceforge.net/ ? Then, for your pre-review of 226795 - Well, this package seems somewhat special. For compiler package, the files, which usually should be in -devel package for other cases, are allowed to (and quite often, should) be in main package. But other pre-reviews seems good. Okay.. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (fuse-convmvfs) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . During the procedure, I will receive a mail which tells that you need a sponsor and the I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review