https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #25 from Joseph Marrero <jmarrero@xxxxxxxxx> --- I think skiping this package is non sense, a lot of people wants the stock csync too right? So I will package csync uptream if that is ok by Andreas since the spec is almost the same for both. And try and set csync owncloud to ocsync or owncloud-csync then for mirall set it for look for owncloud-csync or bundle it with Mirall. If Klass is the uptream for Mirall and his version of Csync I guess the right call is to use his code for mirall and owncloud-csync until a version of mirall that uses csync. When Mirall uses the uptream csync as dep then csync-owncloud will not be neaded any more but we can't tell if this will ever happen. Its hard to say it will, csync-owncloud has been under constant changes as per owncloud and mirall all this are in constant development. By maintaining uptream csync, owncloud-csync and mirall I can work for this to happen in a timely maner. Now the question is if @Adreas Schneider is ok having me maintaining his csync or if he wants to maintain the fedora package for uptream csync. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review