https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208 --- Comment #23 from Gregor Tätzner <gregor@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #20) > icky, ok, so one way forward would be to opt to rename *this* one to > something like owncloud-csync to clearly designate that it's a fork, and > possibly patch to rename the binary and shlib accordingly. It would > *appear* that mirall/owncloud may in fact only use the library portion, so > we could further consider packaging only that piece as well (to avoid > potential conflicts with any stock csync that may come to fedora) (In reply to comment #19) > OTOH, the only reason csync is being packaged at all is for > mirall. If upstream csync.org csync is not (yet?) suitable for mirall, we > cannot use that. Whats about skipping this package and just bundling csync-owncloud into mirall? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review