https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839064 --- Comment #42 from Brenton Leanhardt <bleanhar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #39) > Note: > [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and > meets > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > Guidelines. > [-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. > > At some point in the future, you may want to evaluate creating a separate > doc package. Agreed. There are several people packaging OpenShift for Fedora and once the dust settles a little bit we'll do this for all our packages at once. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review