https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211 --- Comment #3 from Gregor Tätzner <gregor@xxxxxxxxxx> --- a more in deep look: - the package contains desktop file icons - you must update the icon cache: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache - mirall.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmirallsync.so /lib64/libQtTest.so.4... -> again set -Wl,--as-needed - upstream names the owncloud-client binary just owncloud. This is dumb and much too generic. Maybe owncloud-sync-client would be more appropriate...be creative but don't forget the desktop file - actually this package ships two apps: a sync client and some kind of installation tool. Would it make sense to split it up? I how far are those 2 apps related? Can you use one without the other? - blocker: mirall.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libmirallsync.so libmirallsync.so The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or lib<libname>-<major>.so. mirall.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libowncloudsync.so libowncloudsync.so The soname of the library is neither of the form lib<libname>.so.<major> or lib<libname>-<major>.so. ->I suppose these are not dev libs, so they must be versioned - "- moved exclude.lst to /etc/mirall/" Is it that easy? Are you sure the config file is still read by the client? Oh, and mark it as %config - BuildRequires: inetd desktop-file-utils Builds fine without inetd? keep up :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review