Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-11 15:41 EST ------- In reply to comment #8: 1. True. I guess it's not a big deal either way if you list it or not. 2. ok. 4. ok. Might mention in this review just for completeness. 5. Well, since the package uses pkgconfig it's pretty easy to move things and have anything using the devel package pick up the correct include path. You are correct however in that it would be good for upstream to make this change. Is upstream responsive? Would they take a change like that? Can you ask them? Some of the headers have a rdf_ namespace, but at least 2 do not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review