[Bug 847504] Review Request: rubygem-scoped_search - Easily search you ActiveRecord models

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847504

--- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> > Well, there is no other gem to my knowledge, which would move the files outside
> > of their original locations, so if your package should be exceptional, so be
> > it. It is up to you.
> 
> Just few statistics from my machine:
> $ rpm -qal |grep LICENSE |grep -v /usr/share/doc|wc -l
> 145
> $ rpm -qal |grep LICENSE |grep  /usr/share/doc|wc -l
> 631
> $ rpm -qal |grep LICENSE |grep -v /usr/share/doc |grep /gems/|wc -l
> 57
> 
> So I would say rubygems are the exception. Anyway - I will ask FESCO to
> standardize this.

I was always referring just to RubyGems. Other packages spread their files all
over the place while gems keeps their files in one location. No problem to
involve FESCo.

> > ad test suite
> Indeed. But that is only because in minimal Koji environment is run test
> against only one database. If you have more librearies installed, more test
> fails.
> Anyway, will investigate it.

Yes, minimal buildroot, that is what matters. More libraries means more DB
adapters and that is not easy. I doubt that you will be successful to run the
test suite against other databases, since their setup is typically a magnitude
harder then setup sqlite3 DB.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]