https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844164 --- Comment #15 from Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I guess, this licensing thing will be ok. It's just the header file which is apparently copied from OpenBSD and BSD licensed only. Another issue: [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in non-devel package (fix or explain):mate- vfs-smb-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libbzip2.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libcomputer.so mate- vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libdns- sd.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libftp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libgzip.so mate- vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libnetwork.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libnntp.so mate- vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libtar.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libvfs-test.so -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review