https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551 --- Comment #38 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #37) > Dear Parag and Steven, > > I am not here to do master in reviewing or put my free time on reviewing. > > I was suppose to package sugar activities for fedora which are having same > structure. > > Please try to understand what i was trying to and i do not want to > contribute as a reviewer as I do not have much free time. > > Due to this reviewing thing all packaged sugar activities are on hold and i > do not have nothing to do. > > And next thing is other sugar activity packages did not follow this 5 > reviews rule. > Note: again this is my criteria to get sponsored from me. I already said there are may packager sponsors in Fedora. Try to contact any one of them and they if like your work will sponsor you. > You guys should think again about how to get people in to reviewing but not > forcing others to review to reduce the number of pending reviews. If people think like this then as I said already we will end up with so many package reviews waiting for their initial comment at least. > > I have packaged more than 8 sugar activities but i did not continue after > this incident. > > I do not work on each and every application but i just want to stick in to > sugar activities. If you have no time they why not ask on devel list to either work on these packages or submit these packages again with fresh review request with new owners? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review