https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844164 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated ==== C/C++ ==== [x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: MUST Package contains no static executables. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in non-devel package (fix or explain):mate- vfs-smb-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libbzip2.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libcomputer.so mate- vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libdns- sd.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libftp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libgzip.so mate- vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libnetwork.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libnntp.so mate- vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libsftp.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/mate- vfs-2.0/modules/libtar.so mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64 /mate-vfs-2.0/modules/libvfs-test.so ==== Generic ==== [x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: MUST %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5 [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [!]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required [-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "BSD (2 clause) GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "BSD (2 clause)" For detailed output of licensecheck see file: /home/mrunge/review/844164-mate-vfs/licensecheck.txt [x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters. [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST No %config files under /usr. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: MUST If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5) Note: Only applicable for EL-5 [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: SHOULD Buildroot is not present Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine [x]: SHOULD Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required [x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [?]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: SHOULD The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: SHOULD SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. Issues: [!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5) Note: Only applicable for EL-5 See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#EL5 Rpmlint ------- Checking: mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.src.rpm mate-vfs-devel-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm mate-vfs-smb-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm mate-vfs-debuginfo-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm mate-vfs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP mate-vfs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP mate-vfs.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mate-vfs-1.4.0/AUTHORS mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-monitor mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-ls mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-copy mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-rm mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-mv mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-mkdir mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-cat mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-info mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-df mate-vfs.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm mate-vfs.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm mate-vfs-smb.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 253 errors, 15 warnings. - wrong fsf-address already fixed upstream, this is not a blocker. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint mate-vfs-debuginfo mate-vfs mate-vfs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP mate-vfs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmatevfs-2.so.0.396.4 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0 mate-vfs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmatevfs-2.so.0.396.4 /lib64/librt.so.1 mate-vfs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmatevfs-2.so.0.396.4 /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 mate-vfs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmatevfs-2.so.0.396.4 /lib64/libselinux.so.1 mate-vfs.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mate-vfs-1.4.0/AUTHORS mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-monitor mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-ls mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-copy mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-rm mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-mv mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-mkdir mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-cat mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-info mate-vfs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary matevfs-df mate-vfs.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm mate-vfs.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 203 errors, 17 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' - The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). Requires -------- mate-vfs-devel-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libmatevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) mate-vfs(x86-64) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 pkgconfig(gmodule-no-export-2.0) pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) pkgconfig(gthread-2.0) pkgconfig(mateconf-2.0) mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /sbin/ldconfig config(mate-vfs) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 gvfs libacl.so.1()(64bit) libacl.so.1(ACL_1.0)(64bit) libattr.so.1()(64bit) libavahi-client.so.3()(64bit) libavahi-common.so.3()(64bit) libavahi-glib.so.1()(64bit) libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcom_err.so.2()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfam.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgssapi_krb5.so.2()(64bit) libgssapi_krb5.so.2(gssapi_krb5_2_MIT)(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libk5crypto.so.3()(64bit) libkrb5.so.3()(64bit) libmateconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libmatevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libresolv.so.2()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libselinux.so.1()(64bit) libssl.so.10()(64bit) libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.5.0)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) mate-conf rtld(GNU_HASH) mate-vfs-smb-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): config(mate-vfs-smb) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 libavahi-client.so.3()(64bit) libavahi-common.so.3()(64bit) libavahi-glib.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libmateconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libmatevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libresolv.so.2()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libselinux.so.1()(64bit) libsmbclient.so.0()(64bit) libssl.so.10()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) mate-vfs(x86-64) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 rtld(GNU_HASH) mate-vfs-debuginfo-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- mate-vfs-devel-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm: mate-vfs-devel = 1.4.0-8.fc19 mate-vfs-devel(x86-64) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 pkgconfig(mate-vfs-2.0) = 1.4.0 pkgconfig(mate-vfs-module-2.0) = 1.4.0 mate-vfs-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm: config(mate-vfs) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 libbzip2.so()(64bit) libcomputer.so()(64bit) libdns-sd.so()(64bit) libfile.so()(64bit) libftp.so()(64bit) libgzip.so()(64bit) libhttp.so()(64bit) libmatevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libnetwork.so()(64bit) libnntp.so()(64bit) libsftp.so()(64bit) libtar.so()(64bit) libvfs-test.so()(64bit) mate-vfs = 1.4.0-8.fc19 mate-vfs(x86-64) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 mate-vfs-smb-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm: config(mate-vfs-smb) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 libsmb.so()(64bit) mate-vfs-smb = 1.4.0-8.fc19 mate-vfs-smb(x86-64) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 mate-vfs-debuginfo-1.4.0-8.fc19.x86_64.rpm: mate-vfs-debuginfo = 1.4.0-8.fc19 mate-vfs-debuginfo(x86-64) = 1.4.0-8.fc19 MD5-sum check ------------- http://pub.mate-desktop.org/releases/1.4/mate-vfs-1.4.0.tar.xz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 0e5e0c4cb607c13d6d356c59699de78d93f2b72e620b99244bf4fc329925dd9b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0e5e0c4cb607c13d6d356c59699de78d93f2b72e620b99244bf4fc329925dd9b Generated by fedora-review 0.2.2 (9f8c0e5) last change: 2012-08-09 Command line :/bin/fedora-review -b 844164 Issues: - you should convert authors-file to utf8 - you need to fix licensing: [mrunge@turing 844164-mate-vfs]$ cat licensecheck.txt | grep BSD /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/mate-vfs-1.4.0/modules/sftp.h: BSD (2 clause) /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/mate-vfs-1.4.0/modules/sftp-method.c: BSD (2 clause) GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) You need to list those extra and add BSD to license. Once license is fixed, I see no other blockers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review