[Bug 227669] Review Request: <ppl-0.9> - <A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: <ppl-0.9> - <A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions>


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2007-02-10 10:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)

> [no static libs]
> 
> > Is this really necessary?
> 
> This is what the Packaging Committee works on:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage

I didn't looked at the package itself, but from the
description it seems that it would be ok to provide static 
libraries, it seems the usual case of numerical software
where static libraries may be useful and are not harmful. 
They should be put in a -static subpackage, however. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]