https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839064 --- Comment #15 from Brenton Leanhardt <bleanhar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- SRPM: http://brenton.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/rubygem-openshift-origin-common/201208061331/rubygem-openshift-origin-common-0.13.3-2.fc18.src.rpm fedora-review: http://brenton.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/rubygem-openshift-origin-common/201208061331/rubygem-openshift-origin-common-review.txt Spec: http://brenton.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/rubygem-openshift-origin-common/201208061331/rubygem-openshift-origin-common.spec I fixed a number of issues recorded in the changelog. I also attached the fedora-review output because I don't understand some of the output: [!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. I'm not sure why this is failing. The source packages does include it's own license file and it is included in %doc. [!]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. /home/rpmbuild/rpmbuild/SPECS/openshift-origin-common-0.13.3.gem : MD5SUM this package : e8c3b740b2bf8f6cd2149c4928766d14 MD5SUM upstream package : d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e When I download http://mirror.openshift.com/pub/openshift-origin/source/rubygem-openshift-origin-common/openshift-origin-common-0.13.3.gem and check the md5sum it's e8c3b740b2bf8f6cd2149c4928766d14. That's also the md5sum for ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/openshift-origin-common-0.13.3.gem for the user that's building this package. Where is d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e coming from? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review