Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226201 jima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |harald@xxxxxxxxxx CC| |jima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From jima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-09 15:27 EST ------- OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ea50419f99472200c4184a304e3831ea nmap-4.20.tar.bz2 ea50419f99472200c4184a304e3831ea nmap-4.20.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. See below - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version 0 bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package. 1. Not sure if this is a blocker, but the standard format for defattr now is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) People I've talked to have had the opinion that it's a "should." 2. The recommended BuildRoot is: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 3. rpmlint says: rpmlint on nmap-4.20-2.fc7.src.rpm W: nmap mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 56, tab: line 62) W: nmap patch-not-applied Patch1: makefile.patch W: nmap patch-not-applied Patch0: inet_aton.patch The first one is easy enough to fix if you want to change the multiple spaces on lines 56-59 to tabs; I don't believe it's a blocker, though. I don't believe the other two are, either, but if you're done with the patches... :-) Also, I had a couple other concerns about the package. First off, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 I've successfully tested the package with this change: -%makeinstall nmapdatadir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/nmap +make install nmapdatadir=%{_datadir}/nmap DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Secondly, there's a pretty major mistake in nmap-4.20-nostrip.patch. As I said in an email to Florian La Roche (who, as far as I can tell, added that patch): --- snip --- In your effort to remove -s's from install lines, you also made this effective change: -$(SHTOOL) mkln -f -s $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/nmapfe $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/xnmap +$(SHTOOL) mkln -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/nmapfe $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/xnmap Which has this annoying effect on the build: ln: `nmapfe': hard link not allowed for directory ... RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/nmap-root/usr/bin/xnmap I'm pretty sure that's not what you meant to do. :-) I fixed the patch in my local copy and threw it against my buildsys and it worked fine. Just thought I'd let you know. --- snip --- So, please, add the -s back to the `mkln` part of that line. The build fails otherwise. :-P In closing, if you could address the above issues, I think nmap should be cleared for merging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review