[Bug 845245] Review Request: cura-providers - Set of basic CIM providers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845245

--- Comment #3 from Jan Safranek <jsafrane@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: cura-providers-0.0.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
          cura-powermanagement-0.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
          cura-providers-0.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
          cura-providers-debuginfo-0.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
          cura-fan-0.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
          cura-providers-devel-0.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
          cura-service-0.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
cura-providers.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig
/usr/lib64/libcuracommon.so.0.0.1
cura-providers.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig

I don't know what this means, it contradicts itself. There *is* ldconfig in
cura-providers %postun

cura-providers-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Develoment ->
Development, Envelopment
cura-providers-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Develoment
-> Development, Envelopment

Please fix :)

cura-providers-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Ok, there is not much to document.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]