[Bug 831749] Review Request: rubygem-sshkey - Generate ssh key-pairs using ruby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831749

--- Comment #26 from Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
rubygem-sshkey-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/share/gems/doc/sshkey-1.3.1/ri/SSHKey/valid_ssh_public_key%3f-c.ri %3f

Using ? in an API name doesn't seem to make much sense (the decoded %3f).  Is
there some rationale for upstream using this in the documentation name?  I'd
generally say this is not a valid character for a filename.

Please work with upstream to fix this problem.  If this is a common issue with
ruby libraries, please file an rpmlint bug in bugzilla with the idea that %
encoding in RI doc files should be ignored.

rubygem-sshkey-doc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/gems/doc/sshkey-1.3.1/ri/cache.ri

Something about this file is wrong - it may be that the file is encoded in DOS
format when it should be encoded in non-dos format.  See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding

Please work with upstream to resolve these issues - they will annoy all
distributions, not just Fedora.

Still these issues are not blockers, since the ? is escaped in the filename and
passes UTF-8 encoding.  And the other issue really looks like an upstream
issue.  If this is not an upstream issue, please file an rpmlint bug if this is
standard operation in Ruby applications so that rpmlint can be improved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]