https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824478 --- Comment #3 from Robert Spanton <rspanton@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Richard, > [!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) > Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean Hmm. The %clean section is already present and contains exactly that line. > [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 > Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging > for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions The %files section has a %defattr line at the top... > [!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the > beginning of %install. > Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5 The %install section has exactly that line at the top. > [!]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. It's still the latest LTS release version. > Would be nice if in some point we can provide not only LTS releases but also > more recent versions. Do you think it would be feasible and worth the effort? Here's what Peter Bigot, the mspgcc maintainer, has said the LTS releases are for: Downstream packagers should publish only LTS releases, and should periodically check for new patches to be integrated into their packages (though I'll try to announce them periodically). I would prefer to stick with the LTS releases, as these are the wishes of the project. Hopefully that addresses all the issues. Cheers, Rob -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review