https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165 --- Comment #21 from Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> --- No, I mean use foo.1.* , so if the spec is ported on another distribution using lzma, or if Fedora start to use lzma, bz2 or something else, you will have no change to make later. And I do not understand why you have attached all those patches, my point was they go against the spirit of the recommendation for patches : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream IE, now there is a new upstream, I think they should really take a look at those patches and see if they are acceptable for them, or say if they reject them. If they do not apply as such, I would take the source code without patch, use patcher ( or git ), and try to apply them one by one, and record the change with git add, and then inspect each patch to see if it look like the old one, if it fixes the issue, if it doesn't introduce a new one ( especially with patch that are applied with the fuzzy option, they can be applied at the wrong location and introduce subtle bugs that upstream developers will never reproduce because they do not have the same patch, giving us a bad reputation ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review