[Bug 842013] Review Request: nfsometer - NFS Performance Framework Tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842013

--- Comment #10 from Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> There is 2 rpmlint warning :
> 
> nfsometer.x86_64: W: non-standard-group System Tools
> 
> nfsometer.x86_64: E: no-binary
> 
> You need to add Arch: noarch ( since that's a noarch rpm ), and fix the
> group ( even if i am not sure of the status of the group in Fedora, as there
> is no policy, 
I'm assuming you mean a "BuildArch: noarch"
I changed the group to: "Group: Applications/System"

> 
> The license tag is also wrong, should be GPLv2+ ( since there is a "or
> later" clause )
The License is now: "License: GPLv2+"

> 
> 
> 
> Running it show that it may use iozone and bonnie++, should they be added as
> Requires or as a documentation somehwere ? ( also, it may need git, make,
> tar and other stuff, so I am not sure on how to proceed there ) 
Those will be used if they exist... The README talks about which workloads
exist by default and which ones are optional... So I think this is good 
to go... 

I believe I have all the rpmlint warnings removed:

$ rpmlint nfsometer-1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint nfsometer.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


Spec file and source rpm have on http://steved.fedorapeople.org/nfsometer/ have
been updated (and restorecon-ed ;-) )

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]