https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843153 --- Comment #3 from Michal Minar <miminar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Source of the gem > - Could you please explain what is the relation between your fork and the > original gem, which could be found on RubyGems.org? I cannot imagine that > I would approve your fork of the gem where the upstream lives on other > place. > I'll refrain from any further comments until you settle down this matter > with > upstream? > > Thank you. The main reason for mine fork was some missing features in upstream project needed by our team. Some of them were implemented by kkaempf in another fork, that are still to be accepted by upstream. So from my point of view, the upstream is little bit unresponsive. But you are right. I should push my changes to upstream first. Thank you for your observation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review