[Bug 838756] Review Request: maven-indexer - Standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756

--- Comment #6 from Gerard Ryan <gerard@xxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The LICENSE file must be included in the SRPM and installed as %doc.
> This is required by the point 4. of the license.

It's already being installed as %doc, and by extension is included in the SRPM,
right?

> /usr/share/java/maven-indexer-core-cli.jar contains bundled libraries.
> Please remove them. See:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

Done. The entire jar was bundled libs. Turns out that's what maven-shade-plugin
does...I guess maven-shade-plugin shouldn't be used in any fedora packages in
this case.

> Packaging guidelines says "If the number of provided JAR files exceeds
> two, you MUST place them into a sub-directory named %{name}."
> Please obey this rule. See:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Installation_directory

Ah yeah, I (incorrectly) was looking at the draft guidelines, where the MUST is
substituted for a CAN:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate#Installation_directory

Anyway, the uber-jar is no longer being installed, so this no longer applies :)

Spec URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/maven-indexer/4.1.2-3/maven-indexer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/maven-indexer/4.1.2-3/maven-indexer-4.1.2-3.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]