[Bug 227717] Review Request: gimmie - Gnome panel revisited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gimmie -  Gnome panel revisited


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227717





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx  2007-02-08 13:07 EST -------
Review:

+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS.
+ source files match upstream.
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is LGPL matched with COPYING file entry.
+ %doc is right (NEWS can be dropped from this field).
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ post ans postun is correctly set.
+ python_sitelib present.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent. (just use %{name}insted of gimmie
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.

-------
I can approved it cause i'm not a sponsor.

You should think about adding a desktop entry for this app.

-------


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]