[Bug 839527] Review Request: rtirq - realtime IRQ threading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527

--- Comment #3 from Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> * I really don't like the idea to introduce another SysVinit-script. It
> won't be easy to switch to systemd later. You may use the following approach
> which is used in libvirt-clients

I thought long and hard about this whilst I was preparing this for review but
am hesitant to do this - I'm sure Rui upstream will get there eventually and
I'd prefer to leave it up to him (he's started packaging for Suse so I'm sure
he'll get there).  As this is moving from CCRMA I'm also very cognizant of
shifting the ground under the feet of current users.

Copied Fernando for comment
> 
> ==============
> 
> [Unit]
> Description=Realtime IRQ thread tunning
> After=sound.target alsa-restore.service
> 
> [Service]
> EnvironmentFile=-/etc/sysconfig/rtirq
> ExecStart=/usr/bin/rtirq.sh start
> ExecStop=/usr/bin/rtirq.sh stop
> 
> [Install]
> WantedBy=multi-user.target
> 
> ==============
> 
> 
> * Installation path for udev rules is wrong. In fact you should install them
> into /usr/lib/udev/rules.d unless you're installing them on EL5. Since EL6
> and Fedora 12 (afaik) /etc/udev/rules.d is intended for udev-rules override
> by the sysadmin.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]