https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551 --- Comment #28 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- You are asking me to get you sponsored based that you don't have time to review other packages? What if all new people coming with this mindset. Then, we will endup with so many package reviews waiting. This reviewing work not only demonstrate that you understand rpm packaging well but help other people who used to wait years and years to get first initial comment on their package review. So tell me who is pushing? There are reviews lying since years in Fedora and still some of them getting regularly updated but not yet finished. There is no precise definition given for sponsorship by FESCo. So its upto sponsor to decide criteria for sponsorship and I can see you are still not familiar with recent fedora packaging changes. So I asked to do reviews and its also written in sponsorship policy. You can even search in bugzilla that other sponsor not even approve the package before they can see contributor has done reviews. So if you have no time in next 2 weeks then you can resume work after that. Else, find someone who is already in packager group and he can take over these reviews and request fedora-cvs and build it in fedora. If you think my criteria of asking people to do 5 reviews is wrong then I will not proceed here and remove your packager request. Please reply so that I can add back FE-NEEDSPONSOR in your all reviews so that other sponsor can look into your reviews and then sponsor you. If I remember I didn't even sponsor my team members just because they need sponsorship and has not done any reviews. For me reviews are necessary to get sponsorship. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review