https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836749 --- Comment #4 from Tim Sally <tsally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- David, Thanks a lot for the informal review. In regards to the license, the project is GPL3. Please see the below personal communication with the author: -- >From agner@xxxxxxxxx Sun Jul 1 02:53:03 2012 Return-Path: <agner@xxxxxxxxx> X-Original-To: tsally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Delivered-To: tsally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <4FEFF3A5.9060509@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:52:21 +0200 From: Agner Fog <agner@xxxxxxxxx> Organization: agner@xxxxxxxxx User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Sally <tsally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Which version of GPL for objconv? References: <20120630192315.GA13389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> In-Reply-To: <20120630192315.GA13389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Status: RO Content-Length: 193 Lines: 12 version 3.0 On 30-06-2012 21:23, Tim Sally wrote: > Hi Anger, > > Thank you very much for writing objconv! I know it is GPL licensed, but > I am wondering which version? > > Thanks, > > Tim > -- As to the other issues, I will generate a new spec addressing them tonight! Thanks again for the review, Tim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review