[Bug 841199] New: Review Request: pyobd - OBD-II (SAE-J1979) compliant scantool software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841199

            Bug ID: 841199
        QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
          Severity: medium
           Version: rawhide
          Priority: medium
                CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx,
                    package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
          Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
           Summary: Review Request: pyobd - OBD-II (SAE-J1979) compliant
                    scantool software
        Regression: ---
      Story Points: ---
    Classification: Fedora
                OS: Linux
          Reporter: jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx
              Type: ---
     Documentation: ---
          Hardware: All
        Mount Type: ---
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
           Product: Fedora

Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/pyobd.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jskarvad/pyobd-0.9.2.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: pyOBD is an OBD-II (SAE-J1979) compliant scantool software written
entirely in Python. It is meant to interface with the low cost ELM 32x
devices such as ELM-USB.
Fedora Account System Username: jskarvad

rpmlint:
pyobd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyobd/obd_io.py
pyobd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/bin/pyobd
pyobd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyobd/debugEvent.py
pyobd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyobd/obd2_codes.py
pyobd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyobd/obd_sensors.py
pyobd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/pyobd-0.9.2.2/COPYING

The problem seems to be in address (snail-mail), but in recent template there
is URL instead. I will notify upstream about this problem, but probably I am
not supposed to patch it (according to bug 700095 comment 1).

I made several changes (e.g. moved all support code to pyobd module) that I see
as improvements (I will contact upstream about it).

Also it seems that upstream recently switched to some wacky numbering (i.e.
pyobd-0.9.2-2). I transformed it to the quaternion (pyobd-0.9.2.2).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]