https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252 --- Comment #101 from leigh scott <leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #97) > If we want to move this forward, we need to fix the bugs that prevent the > package from building in rawhide. > > (In reply to comment #79) > > F18 cinnamon fails here as well (upstream needs to catch up), could you use > > F17 instead for this review. > > Not really. As long as it does not build in rawhide, you cannot import the > package because you would create a broken upgrade path. Rawhide is where > development happens and I'm afraid if the package already lags behind during > review, this will happen again with every single release. Trust me, this is > no fun for both the maintainer and the users. > I could probably build git snapshots for F18 after patching cinnamon for the introspection changes. > (In reply to comment #91) > > Bug are not in the scope of a package review > > "The purpose of this formal review is to try to ensure that the package > meets the quality control requirements for Fedora. This does not mean that > the package (or the software being packaged) is perfect, but it should meet > baseline minimum requirements for quality." > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process IMO cinnamon easily meets baseline minimum requirements for quality. comment #90 was another attempt by Ralf to derail this review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review