https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837313 --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> --- This package still doesn't look like it has been properly reviewed. Andreas, there's many templates out there of what needs to be checked on review that you could use (for instance: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/Review_Template ). You can also just use http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines and post that in checklist form. If you aren't checking at least the things mentioned in the Packaging Guidelines, then you aren't doing a proper review. So far, your reviews don't appear to have done that (as you missed easily spotted things after your initial review in Comment #1 and your followup in Comment #6 doesn't say that you then checked the package against the Guidelines, only that you built it and installed it.) If you are doing the full review just not writing it down, also remember that the package review is a means of communication. If you don't write down what has been checked, what was good, and what was bad, you aren't recording information on the package that people may need later when figuring out why or when a package started doing something wrong. Guenther, please don't build this package until Andreas has done a full review -- I see at least one other thing that Andreas hasn't done which should lead to either a change in %files or a comment about why it is the way it is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review