https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839064 Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Informal Review: Don't forget to include rubygem-devel. Please use the macro's that are included in rubygems-devel. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Macros Using the new way of building gems in rpms will help keep rubygem packages more uniform. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Building_gems Please attach an rpmlint output. Here is what I got $ rpmlint rubygem-stickshift-common.spec rubygem-stickshift-common.spec: E: specfile-error -e:1: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. rubygem-stickshift-common.spec: E: specfile-error -e:1: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rubygem-stickshift-common-0.13.1-1.src.rpm rubygem-stickshift-common.src: W: non-coherent-filename rubygem-stickshift-common-0.13.1-1.src.rpm rubygem-stickshift-common-0.13.1-1.git.45.ecfb399.fc16.src.rpm rubygem-stickshift-common.src: E: specfile-error -e:1: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. rubygem-stickshift-common.src: E: specfile-error -e:1: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. It looks like if you use the rubygems-devel %{ruby_sitelibdir} instead of the one you have in %global, the RBCongif error will go away. Also, your src.rpm should be named rubygem-stickshift-common-0.13.1-1.git.45.ecfb399.fc16.src.rpm I'm not sure if you changed the name intentionaly or not, but you should keep the rpm names what they are supposed to be. It might look better for the moment, but it causes confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review