https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649 --- Comment #25 from Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #22) > Oops, I didn't realise Nelson needed a sponsor. I think in that case the > review is supposed to be done by the sponsor. But since this one is done > now, I will reset the fedora-review+ flag, unless Matthias has any > objections? Hi Dan, yes, Nelson was unaware, he needed a sponsor for EPEL, too. Since his other package review requests don't look bad, I've sponsored him. Package guidelines are saying, the first review must be done from a sponsor; in practice, this is often handled as in this case. Dan, you did a good and solid job in this review, so I don't see a requirement, to do that again for myself. Thank you! Nelson, just go ahead. If you want Dan as co-maintainer, too, you should insert a new Package SCM request. Only the last request will be handled. @Pingou Regarding re-setting all kinds of flags and assignments, I'm currently suspecting some kind of JavaScript blocker, but this is just a working thesis. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review