https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659 --- Comment #13 from David Levine <par.packager@xxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-7.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-7.fc17.src.rpm I had already gone back and forth on the -s. Without it, there's a warning from rpmlint complaining about not having it :-/ The par summary that says that it's better than fmt has been floating around since 2002, at least. And its man page justifies the claim. But I changed it to be something that I think is less pretentious but still helpful. $ rpm -qf `which rpmlint` rpmlint-1.4-6.fc17.noarch $ rpmlint -o 'ValidLicenses ("Par")' par par.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) reformatter -> reformatted, reformatting, reformatory par.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fmt -> ft, mt, fit par.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bodiless -> bodices par.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/par 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review